|
|
xiii | |
|
|
xiv | |
Foreword |
|
xv | |
Preface |
|
xix | |
Section 1 |
|
|
The Challenge of Training Impact |
|
|
1 | (17) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
The Myth of Training as ``Delivery of Events,'' |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
The Logic of Training Impact |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
Beyond the Transfer of Training |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Understanding Training Impact |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Does the E-World Change Everything? |
|
|
18 | (23) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Applications and Advantages |
|
|
23 | (7) |
|
|
30 | (5) |
|
|
35 | (5) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
The High-Impact Learning Model |
|
|
41 | (18) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (5) |
|
Comparing the Experiences |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (7) |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Assumptions of the HIL Process |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Integrating High-Impact Learning Process Elements |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
Section 2 |
|
|
Mapping Linkage to Business Goals |
|
|
59 | (22) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
What is an ``Impact Map''? |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
Fundamental Impact Map Structure |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
|
65 | (8) |
|
|
73 | (5) |
|
Strategic Purposes for Impact Mapping |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Creating Learner Intentionality |
|
|
81 | (18) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Learner Intentionality: An Example |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
A Basis in Learning Research |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Individualized Learning via ``Mass Customization,'' |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Individuals Achieve Training Impact |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Advantages of Intentionality |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
Creating Intentionality: Methods and Tools |
|
|
92 | (6) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Providing Effective Learning Interactions |
|
|
99 | (20) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Respecting Adult Learners |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
Matching Learning Methods with Desired Outcomes |
|
|
102 | (7) |
|
Four Key Dimensions of Powerful Learning Interactions |
|
|
109 | (7) |
|
Blended Solutions: Revisited |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
|
119 | (21) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
A Framework for Analyzing Performance |
|
|
122 | (7) |
|
Integrating Performance Support into a Blended Solution |
|
|
129 | (10) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
Section 3 |
|
|
Crafting High-Impact Learning Initiatives |
|
|
140 | (24) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Traditional Instructional Systems Design |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Problems with the ADDIE/ISD Approach |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
A Deeper Look at Phase One: Analyze |
|
|
149 | (7) |
|
A Deeper Look at Phase Two: Design |
|
|
156 | (4) |
|
A Deeper Look at Phase Three: Create and Try Out |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Using Evaluation to Build Organizational Performance and Learning Capability |
|
|
164 | (24) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Evaluation and Organizational Learning Capability |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Implicit Evaluation Strategy |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
The Risks of an Implicit Evaluation Strategy |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
Redefining an Evaluation Strategy for Performance Improvement |
|
|
172 | (4) |
|
|
176 | (11) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
High-Impact Employee Development Planning |
|
|
188 | (21) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Why HIL and Employee Development Planning Must Be Aligned |
|
|
189 | (4) |
|
Weaknesses of Typical EDP Systems |
|
|
193 | (4) |
|
Key Purposes for Development Planning |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Balancing Individual and Organizational Needs |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Integrating EDP with Other HR Systems |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
The HIL Development Planning Approach |
|
|
202 | (6) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
Making the Transition to High-Impact Learning |
|
|
209 | (24) |
|
|
209 | (6) |
|
Strategies for Making the HIL Transition |
|
|
215 | (11) |
|
Beyond HIL: Influencing Organizational Effectiveness |
|
|
226 | (6) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
Index |
|
233 | |