PREFACE |
|
xi | |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|
xv | |
Part I Research Methods |
|
1 | (40) |
|
|
|
WHAT Do WE KNOW WHEN WE KNOW A PERSON? |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
Robert Rosenthal and Donald B. Rubin |
|
|
|
A SIMPLE, GENERAL-PURPOSE DISPLAY OF MAGNITUDE OFEXPERIMENTAL EFFECT |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
Lee J. Cronbach and Paul E. Meehl |
|
|
|
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS |
|
|
19 | (9) |
|
Samuel D. Gosling, Oliver |
|
|
|
DO PEOPLE KNOW HOW THEY BEHAVE? SELF-REPORTED ACT |
|
|
|
P. John, Kenneth H. Craik, and Richard W. Robins |
|
|
|
FREQUENCIES COMPARED WITH ON-LINE CODINGS BY OBSERVERS |
|
|
28 | (13) |
Part II The Trait Approach to Personality |
|
41 | (78) |
|
|
|
CARING FOR YOUR INTROVERT |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
William F. Chaplin, Jeffrey B. Phillips, Jonathan D. Brown, Nancy R. Clanton, and Jennifer L. Stein |
|
|
|
HANDSHAKING, GENDER, PERSONALITY, AND FIRST IMPRESSIONS |
|
|
46 | (10) |
|
|
|
WHAT IS A TRAIT OF PERSONALITY? |
|
|
56 | (4) |
|
|
|
CONSISTENCY AND SPECIFICITY IN BEHAVIOR |
|
|
60 | (14) |
|
|
|
SOME REASONS FOR THE APPARENT INCONSISTENCY OF PERSONALITY |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
Douglas T. Kenrick and David C. Funder |
|
|
|
PROFITING FROM CONTROVERSY: LESSONS FROM THE PERSON-SITUATION DEBATE |
|
|
77 | (17) |
|
Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa Jr. |
|
|
|
A FIVE-FACTOR THEORY OF PERSONALITY |
|
|
94 | (12) |
|
|
|
GLOBAL TRAITS: A NEO-ALLPORTIAN APPROACH TO PERSONALITY |
|
|
106 | (13) |
Part III Biological Approaches to Personality |
|
119 | (112) |
|
|
|
|
121 | (7) |
|
James M. Dabbs Jr., Marian F. Hargrove, and Colleen Heusel |
|
|
|
TESTOSTERONE DIFFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE FRATERNITIES: WELL-BEHAVED vs. RAMBUNCTIOUS |
|
|
128 | (7) |
|
William M. Kelley, C. Neil Macrae, Carrie L. Wyland, Selin Cagier, Sara Inati, and Todd F. Heatherton |
|
|
|
FINDING THE SELF? AN EVENT-RELATED FMRI STUDY |
|
|
135 | (8) |
|
Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A.R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff |
|
|
|
BIOBEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO STRESS IN FEMALES: TEND-AND BEFRIEND, NOT FIGHT-OR-FLIGHT |
|
|
143 | (22) |
|
Peter Borkenau, Rainer Riemann, Alois Angleitner, and Frank M. Spinath |
|
|
|
GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON OBSERVEDPERSONALITY: EVIDENCE FROM THE GERMAN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ADULT TWINS |
|
|
165 | (11) |
|
David M. Buss, Randy J. Larsen, Drew Westen, and Jennifer Semmelroth |
|
|
|
SEX DIFFERENCES IN JEALOUSY: EVOLUTION, PHYSIOLOGY, AND PSYCHOLOGY |
|
|
176 | (7) |
|
|
|
THE SEXUAL OVERPERCEPTION BIAS: EVIDENCE OF A SYSTEMATIC BIAS IN MEN FROM A SURVEY OF NATURALLY OCCURRING EVENTS |
|
|
183 | (9) |
|
Alice H. Eagly and Wendy Wood |
|
|
|
THE ORIGINS OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR: EVOLVED DISPOSITIONS VERSUS SOCIAL ROLES |
|
|
192 | (19) |
|
|
|
EXOTIC BECOMES EROTIC: A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION |
|
|
211 | (20) |
Part IV The Psychoanalytic Approach to Personality |
|
231 | (72) |
|
|
|
LECTURE XXXI: THE DISSECTION OF THE PSYCHICAL PERSONALITY |
|
|
233 | (9) |
|
|
|
|
242 | (9) |
|
|
|
|
251 | (5) |
|
|
|
THE DISTRUST BETWEEN THE SEXES |
|
|
256 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
262 | (9) |
|
Roy F. Baumeister, Karen Dale, and Kristin L. Sommer |
|
|
|
FREUDIAN DEFENSE MECHANISMS AND EMPIRICAL FINDINGS IN MODERN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: REACTION FORMATION, PROJECTION, DISPLACEMENT, UNDOING, ISOLATION, SUBLIMATION, AND DENIAL |
|
|
271 | (15) |
|
|
|
DOES VENTING ANGER FEED OR EXTINGUISH THE FLAME? CATHARSIS, RUMINATION, DISTRACTION, ANGER, AND AGGRESSIVE RESPONDING |
|
|
286 | (10) |
|
|
|
WOMB ENVY, TESTYRIA, AND BREAST CASTRATION ANXIETY: WHAT IF FREUD WERE FEMALE? |
|
|
296 | (7) |
Part V Humanistic Approach to Personality |
|
303 | (64) |
|
|
|
THE HUMANISM OF EXISTENTIALISM |
|
|
305 | (8) |
|
|
|
A THEORY OF HUMAN MOTIVATION |
|
|
313 | (11) |
|
|
|
SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF PERSONALITY |
|
|
324 | (12) |
|
|
|
IF WE ARE SO RICH, WHY AREN'T WE HAPPY? |
|
|
336 | (10) |
|
|
|
WHY ARE SOME PEOPLE HAPPIER THAN OTHERS? THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL PROCESSES IN WELL-BEING |
|
|
346 | (12) |
|
Julie K. Norem and Edward C. Chang |
|
|
|
THE POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF NEGATIVE THINKING |
|
|
358 | (9) |
Part VI Cross-Cultural Approaches to Personality |
|
367 | (74) |
|
Elisabeth Kallfick Dyssegaard |
|
|
|
THE DANES CALL IT FRESH AIR |
|
|
369 | (2) |
|
|
|
THE SELF AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN DIFFERING CULTURAL CONTEXTS |
|
|
371 | (16) |
|
Hazel Rose Markus and Shinobu Kitayama |
|
|
|
A COLLECTIVE FEAR OF THE COLLECTIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR SELVES AND THEORIES OF SELVES |
|
|
387 | (13) |
|
|
|
EMOTIONS IN COLLECTIVIST AND INDIVIDUALIST CONTEXTS |
|
|
400 | (10) |
|
|
|
CULTURE, IDENTITY CONSISTENCY, AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING |
|
|
410 | (19) |
|
Veronica Benet-Martinez and Oliver P. John |
|
|
|
TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUASI-INDIGENOUS PERSONALITY CONSTRUCTS: MEASURING LOS CINCO GRANDES IN SPAIN WITH INDIGENOUS CASTILIAN MARKERS |
|
|
429 | (12) |
Part VII Behavioral, Social Learning, and Cognitive Approaches to Personality |
|
441 | (110) |
|
|
|
|
445 | (8) |
|
Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross, and Sheila A. Ross |
|
|
|
IMITATION OF FILM-MEDIATED AGGRESSIVE MODELS |
|
|
453 | (9) |
|
|
|
THE SELF SYSTEM IN RECIPROCAL DETERMINISM |
|
|
462 | (13) |
|
|
|
PERSONALITY COHERENCE AND DISPOSITIONS IN A COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONAITY SYSTEM (CAPS) APPROACH |
|
|
475 | (16) |
|
Catherine A. Sanderson and Nancy Cantor |
|
|
|
CREATING SATISFACTION IN STEADY DATING RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF PERSONAL GOALS AND SITUATIONAL AFFORDANCES |
|
|
491 | (11) |
|
Anthony G. Greenwald and Shelly D. Farnham |
|
|
|
USING THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST TO MEASURE SELF-ESTEEM AND SELF-CONCEPT |
|
|
502 | (17) |
|
Jens B. Asendorpf, Rainer Banse, and Daniel Mucke |
|
|
|
DOUBLE DISSOCIATION BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT PERSONALITY SELF-CONCEPT: THE CASE OF SHY BEHAVIOR |
|
|
519 | (19) |
|
Stanley B. Klein, Judith Loftus, and John F. Kihlstrom |
|
|
|
SELF-KNOWLEDGE OF AN AMNESIAC PATIENT: TOWARD A NEUROPSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY |
|
|
538 | (13) |
REFERENCES FOR EDITORS' NOTES |
|
551 | (2) |
CREDITS |
|
553 | |